It's hard to imagine Lee. But we got the fax and it's from their legal representative and clearly states:Originally Posted by Lee
"Despite General Gonzalez' efforts at reviving the concept of "secondary producers" in the most recent version of regulations in support of 18 U.S.C. 2257, the concept is not supported by the statute itself. The only case addressing the issue, Sundance Assocs. Inc. v. Reno, 139 F.3d 804, 807 (10thCir.1998), held that the "secondary producer" requirements of the regulations to be unconstitutional. We rely on that holding, and further decline to violate the privacy of the performing artistis by disseminating private data when not required to do so by law."
Now unless I'm not reading that correctly, it pretty much says, "You're S.O.L. if you think you're going to get the records."
Aren't companies such as AEBN (for example) considered a "secondary producer" if they're streaming Jet Set videos? And if so, that pretty well "nips it in the bud."
PapaBear





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks