Quote Originally Posted by Lee
Good.

I have been given some faith in the US legal system now.

For them to have found him guilty really would have been a crime, i dont like the guy, i think he is weird but, at the same time, being weird isnt a crime.

Plus, all the evidence was circumstantial anyway.
Just look at one of the two books they found when searching his house. It is legal to own and is a depiction of the making of the movie "Lord of the Flies" so don't get freaked out by the link to the Google search results. If you click the second link those are some of the pics from the book. I think they are not appropriate and should be illegal. It is obviuosly soft kore K*porn in my opinion. Why it's legal is beyond me.

It's when I saw the photos from that book I realized he had an affinity for naked boys and that these alligations, coupled with him sleeping with boys, coupled with him owning photos of naked boys, coupled with past alligations, means he's guilty.

The problem in this case was the credibility of the accusers mother and the accuser. He may not have done it to this boy, but my gut tells me he's done it with others.

They didn't say he wasn't guilty, just not beyond a reasonable doubt :thumbsup: