Quote Originally Posted by Lee
They wont.

2257 has nothing to do with obscenity cases.

Any cereal-box FSC attorney will tell you that
the link came up number 9 on the uncle sam title 18 section 2257 search.. so it is related because obscenity etc is regulated by that title and those sections.

AND when you read the report inspector general lumps C()*P with obscenity. This is what we've complained about for so long as well... porn sites being associated, and regulated, as if we are all C()*P Guilty until proven innocent. As a matter of fact the FSC attorney in his statement on AVNOnline mentioned this in part of the rebutal against the new regs.

In the eyes of the DOJ obscenity and 2257 are related.. and they are the ones coming after us, guilty until proven innocent.

Now do you see how they are linked?