Just did a quick scan..so this is just what caught my attention the most after one read through:

(and I have to say..the government must KNOW they are going to lose this round as their arguments, imho are VERY weak).

DOJ is saying basically that these new regs are a VERY important tool in fighting child porno (their whole argument keeps going back to child porno in this brief) and without it, child porno is going to FLOURISH! (Like there aren't already NUMEROUS laws AGAINST child porno? And didn't republicans USED to say "we need to ENFORCE CURRENT laws..not make new ones!"?)

And they seem to be picking ONE company specifically to make their case as they refer to that company several times..about someone who has the capability to have 600 sites online, thus could be disseminating child porno big time. The DOJ "pooh poohs" this companies response that finding documentation for EVERY person on all their sites to be ridiculous because they are OBVIOUS computer geniuses...I mean..look, they have SIX HUNDRED sites so they know how to work a computer! (This 600 number comes up several times).

Haven't really read the secondary producer info very closely, but I did notice something in the DOJ's response that I missed in the new regs, that could frankly come back to bite them in the ass..more later after I read more.

Brought to you by..."Slade's Notes!"