I do not know how any agreement could be made where the government would agree not to enforce a law against one group [SC members] but enforce the law against another group [non-FSC members]. Either I am way off on my understanding of Constitutional Equal Protection, or else someone is skewing the story to make it sound like the FSC is the only safe haven. If there is an agreement by the DOJ not to enforce the new regs, then in all probability, the DOJ will not enforce the new regs against ANYBODY, FSC member or not.

I also don't like the idea of the government having membership lists. The FBI used membership lists of "homosexual organizations" when they could get them to keep track of us "deviants". Fuck them. And tell those sons-a-bitches I want my dossier back.

Furthermore, I don't like the idea of the DOJ just "agreeing" to not enforce the new regulations--there is no guarantee they would stick to the "agreement". I would go ahead with the hearing and get the TRO as insurance. But then, the FSC never came to this cowboy lawyer for input.