Quote Originally Posted by Lee
Nice.

That means that the FSC sold out the industry and, most likely provided or will provide the DOJ with names of their members or non-members in the industry.

They sold out its that simple.

However, on the plus side, they will alost certainly gain a shitload more members beause of this, you have to love the way money makes the world go round

Glad to see i wasnt wrong about the FSC after all.

Regards,

Lee
I don't see how they sold anyone out.

1. The FSC struck a one-sided deal. Instead of a 10-day TRO which is what they were initially seeking - they got almost a 90-day TRO for their members. No way is this a sell out. They're still going after the full injuction.

2. I have no problem with it applying to only their members. As we all know legal fees are costly. It's not like the FSC lawyers are doing this pro-bono. IMO it's wrong to think other people should fight the fight for you.

companies are paying 1000's of dollars in FSC fees and then others not pay a dime. If you're not willing to cough up a measily $50 for a yearly membership or you say you can't afford it then you shouldn't be in this business.