Quote Originally Posted by Huskyhunks
The DOJ responded to Exhibit A with a point by point analysis of why the FSC should not be granted an injunction. It's somehting like 35 pages long, I read it and just laughed.
The Exhibit A is only addressed in the paragraph I pasted in the original post.

How can an attorney advise his clients NOT to rely on sundance.. then file a case in federal court that DOES rely on Sundance?

I don't know law but I do know that it must certainly weaken their stance.. and this could be why the TRO was delayed .. and may later be denied... what do you guys think?