Quote Originally Posted by thetwink
but, just to play devil's advocate... isn't it possible that when the FSC said not to rely on Sundance, that they didn't know something crucial about why they could rely on it. in other words, they learned new info after making the original statement, that led them to change their position.

just a thought.
Yeah you never know really... especially when they aren't communicating such reasoning to members, or the industry in general.

I find it very odd that we all have gotten the message to become a member of FSC in the recent "news" articles... but we haven't been given access to "the deal". We weren't told yesterday, when they said they had a deal, what it was.. why? They said today that some particulars had to be ironed out at the last minute and that's why we didn't get official notice until today... but that means they DIDN'T have a deal yesterday and the "news" articles were wrong, except for their message to become members of course.

The more I'm digging the more things don't add up. At best they need to get their PR on track with what they're doing to avoid the appearance of shadiness and not have so much doubletalk in the PR they do put out there.