The order said specifically "The Court will forego ruling on the pending motion for temporary restraining order, treat the motion as a motion for preliminary injunction, and will take up scheduling matters at the time of hearing for temporary restraining order on June 23, 2005, 1:30 P.M. "

So the court said SPECIFICALLY that they are treating this as a PRLIMINARY INJUNCTION, which is: A court order to perform or refrain from an action, issued prior to and until the final outcome of the court case. A preliminary injunction is used to preserve the status quo. Which means that things will stay the same until the judge reaches his decision.

So there is no protection for members, or anyone else... only delayed prosecution, as per the stipulation.

Why would the FSC make such extensions if they were going to win this TRO? And why would they not tell everyone this the judge is treating the agreement as a PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, which benefits all? :evil: