the fsc attorneys were there, and the doj guys weren't? fuck, if there had been a way to push for that injunction - maybe there wasn't - that would have been the perfect time to go for it.

can you get an injunction if the opposing attorneys are not present?

Quote Originally Posted by Squirt
Interesting but not an excuse at all. If you read the Hearing on Terms of Stipulation I found.. it shows that the FSC attorney Gross was in court.. and none of the DOJ attorneys were there.. they did however have one of the DOJ attorneys "appear" by phone.. it was attorney Kaplan.

So actually being there in person has nothing to do with the hearing going ahead, as you can see by the DOJ appearing by phone.

I'd like to know the REAL reason this was all done and they are doing a PI instead of a TRO.. and I want to know because I want to be able to fully support them, or not, and when the facts aren't quick to come out, or are mixed.. I don't know how to take them.