Quote Originally Posted by citiboyz
In a nutshell... shortly after June 23, the court changed the dates of the injunction hearing from August 8/9 to August 1/2, but since both sides had been conducting depositions of each other and filing interrogatories in the meantime the two sides agreed that they would only need 1 day to argue before the judge, and that was yesterday. AVN.COM filed a report yesterday, and another today. Both AVN and XBIZ reported on the depositions and the interrogatories as they happened. Like you, I wish that FSC used their website to share breaking news, but at least AVN and XBIZ have been on top of things.

Yes..AVN has been very good in reporting info (just read their big article). I was greatly encouraged by the "summary" of the events so far by the attornies:

"The hearing today went as well or better than we expected," stated Jeffrey Douglas at the conclusion of the day's proceedings. "The issues that we needed to argue before the court were laid out persuasively and passionately. We went into the hearing optimistic that secondary producer requirements, unlawful as they are, would be enjoined, and nothing that occurred in the hearing lessens our optimism. We felt that we had a substantial but smaller chance of having the entire regulatory scheme enjoined. Courts always want to be as conservative as possible when it comes to enjoining a federal regulation, and the judge engaged in appropriate inquiry with our attorneys as to whether or not injunction of the entire scheme were required. We continue to be hopeful that we'll prevail in obtaining an injunction to the entirety of the regulations, and we await the judge's ruling with anticipation."