Dont get me wrong, i like the guys at cybersocket and do work with them.
However I do think that its strange that bad or non working sites gets as far as the final list together with great sites like ones from you guys on the board here.
I think the award would have been seen as better if those not so good sites hadnt made it to the list.
User / vistiors feedback I found has always been very hard to get and I often doubt who makes these nominations. Some cases are clear you all got great sites but who the hell nominates for example:
http://www.fathairycocks.com/
Its a great gallery, nice design and the guy who created it submits his sites to gaydemon but "best free adult site"? Its just a gallery..
Originally Posted by gaydemon
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks