Quote Originally Posted by basschick View Post
i'm with bjorn here. i mean, sure - i'd have been happy to be nominated, but since cybersocket has no kind of quality guidelines or anything else, all a site needs in order to be nominated was to have the owner email a buddy and say "hey, nominate my site". ....

....don't get me wrong - some, like chilihost - deserve to be nominated. but being one of the best sites in some way means a lot more than being listed with a group of sites whose only thing in common is that the site owners and their friends bothered to nominate the sites when most of us didn't bother to nominate anyone. and why? because the winners are so rarely the best - they are just the ones where the webmasters get their surfers or friends to vote without even seeing the site.
You are a real piece of work woman

I can understand someone not liking an awards system

but I do not understand why in hell you accuse LiveTwinksCam, ArmpitLover, GayBucksChip, Jasun, Citiboyz, Ade, IntenseCash, Xstr8Guy, Sana Chan, SC Robert, and myself of sending out emails to people to vote for us, or telling friends to vote for us. Most of us didn't even know nominations were being held and I wasn't even emailed and told I was nominated.

NOTICE the only person you name as not being in your group of crooked nominees is ChilliHost... a moderator on GWW, like you, and a "paying" advertiser on GWW, that says a lot about your character.

You know if you had ANY common sense whatsoever you'd attack Cybersocket by saying it's odd so many GWW people were nominated and it's a clear manipulation trying to break the board up (going with the old GWW vs Cybersocket rivalry you guys have had going on)... but instead you tarnish all of us nominated and attack our integrity, except for your friend chillihost of course.

At this point you had better name names of who you think has emailed people for votes, otherwise you've just implicated all of us, except your close friend chillihost.

We all thank you for your lack of support Patti