Quote Originally Posted by gaybucks_chip View Post
But as soon as you start applying that test, then somebody can say that the content that most of us produce or distribute is offensive or has no redeeming qualities either...
See therein lays the problem i have with a lot of these 'extreme' content producers, there are current tests that the court systems use to judge whether content can be deemed obscene / offensive etc specifically, The Miller Test however, it relys on that burdomsome 'community standards' thing which could vary from town to town or state to state.

I really do think we need to have a law on the books that is definitive in telling us where that proverbial line is drawn.

Also, what Brian mentioned i found interesting because im also of the mindset that just because someone else 'hasnt done it' doesnt make it an artform and, more often than not, the defenses used in such cases are that it is a form of 'art' and well, call me weird, like you Chip i just cant see how someone puking on another person could even be considered art and yet, the producers of such content seem to be under the delusion that is what it is.

Again, as with Brian i think its a case of these types of content producers simply dont have enough creativity in them so they feel the only way they can get anywhere is to push the limits of what could be deemed as obscene.

Will be interesting to see how some of our other community members respond to this topic for sure though

Thanks for both of your answers so far

Regards,

Lee