no, but all vidcaps should be because they are lower quality and while many programs may save them at 200 or even 1000k, the truth is that a 720x480 vidcap looks the exact same quality at 7 or 8 as at 10 because of its inherently lower quality nature. if we're talking about vidcaps from full sized HD video, they are bigger and better, btw.

the sites that have really impressed me lately offer 2 sizes of pics - so guys on dialup are taken care of but those of us who are on broadband can see a high quality pic in a nice big resolution. i was in a site last night that offered the pics in your choice of 600 px, 1200 px, 2000 px, 3000 px and for the newer sets, 4000 px. i see things like that in high quality straight sites like ftvgirls.com a lot but i don't see it - yet - in gay sites.

to be honest, our pics aren't that big. they are just over 1000 pixels on the large side and saved at a quality level of 8. they range from 150k to 300k. i think that's a good inbetween size but we look forward to adding a second pic size in the future. i wouldn't offer digital stills below 800 px if only offering 1 size pic, because on 1024 600 px looks like a postage stamp

Quote Originally Posted by maxpower View Post
Thax Bass your opinion on this was and is well sought after, I have to say I am on track with most of that.

You really think all images should be limed to 200k?

Thinking about adding zips for all images, but I do see a down side of that