Looks like you're trying to paint everything in shades of grey while totally ignoring documented facts, and admissions, by the accussed himself.

I suggest you know about topics you're commenting on, before you post, to avoid looking foolish.

While having sex with 14 year old children isn't illegal in Canada, luring children for sex via the internet is. I find it interesting that you are defending a man that plead quilty to possessing child porn, and had photos of children under 12 having sex with adults, as being a possible victim of the government and the things he admitted to possibly didn't exist or happen.

Things that make you go hmm...

I always like to take the underdogs side and look at things from a fair perspective but when a person pleads guilty to possessing child porn how can you say they might be innocent? I've heard some people use the excuse that they aren't good with age... but there is a big difference between a shaved 18 year old and a 12 year old, as I've mentioned elsewhere.



Quote Originally Posted by Matt 26z View Post
It would be nice to hear the other side of the story. Someone here that is friends with him should have him write a letter for posting on his behalf once he gets settled into his new home.

A part of me would like to think this is a witch hunt on the part of US authorities for doing something perfectly legal in Canada that is considered incredibly illegal here in the US.

The CP on his home computer, how much of it was legal twink porn and TGP thumbnails in his temp internet files of shaven 18+ twinks? I've heard of people being tried for CP based only on thumbs, so who knows what could be going on here.

Also interesting that none of the news stories mention that he worked in porn. That is something you would think these writers would include for the added shock value. They must not be aware. Is someone trying to hide that the "CP" on his computer may have actually been adults?

Things that make you go hmm...