Listen, I'm not defending him for what happened in Canada. He met that boy, he filmed him. For that he is guilty as sin unless there is an extraordinary alternative version of events.

I'm just saying there is a lack of facts available in the media on the US charges. We don't know what they actually found. Reduce the photo size of an 18yo twink to 10-15%, what do you see now? This is the sort of stuff I'm talking about, but maybe they did have him on full size photos that were clearly kids. Who knows.

People do often plead guilty for crimes they did not commit if it looks like they do not have the evidence to exonerate themselves. It's to throw yourself at the mercy of the court in hopes of getting a shorter sentence.

If his side of the story even outside of the courtroom is that he is guilty and had CP on his computer at home, fine, so be it. We had a **** in our midst that is now off the streets.


Quote Originally Posted by Squirt View Post
I find it interesting that you are defending a man that plead quilty to possessing child porn, and had photos of children under 12 having sex with adults, as being a possible victim of the government and the things he admitted to possibly didn't exist or happen.

Things that make you go hmm...
Consider yourself lucky in your wording of that, and stopping where you did.