its really not about the rules. rules im ok with, its about attitude of reviewers, rules being applied differently (xstraight guy makes my point, he has no problems getting listed with a string of nl sites when i and other people i know do). its about them making rules up as they go along. ive had sites not listed because a banner ad was too bright, i mean ffs.

if they could just be honest about why theyre not listing a site id be fine. ive had a cyberage site refused point blank because "it looks like a similar design to one linked with fraud". could they find me the site to compare it with? what do you think. dave even apoliagised and agreed to list the site, i agreed to list a new site (id given that one to pa by then) but only if he reviewed it first. "of course he would" he said. when i pmed him the site, i never heard back. that after him offering to "work with me" to get my sites listed (not that the orgional site broke a single rule in the first place).

daves a nice guy, ive worked closely with him in the past, but as a company their a heap of shit imo - unless your one of the favoured of course.