oh, for goodness sake!

i didn't say everyone nominated themselves. what's more, if i thought people here had done so, i'm polite enough not to have brought it up even if i did think so. i like the people at this board.

there are some good sites listed on those nominations, but how does it validate the hard work, time, money and tons of creativity of those good sites when other sites listed include gallery and a site with no videos and less pics than a premium avs site? and there are more sites there like that.

imo awards should mean something. why should a unique and excellent site chance losing to a half assed and below par site?

i know what voting means but seems like people are nominating and voting not for the sites but for the owners.