100% agreed, i would like to see the world get rid of all nuclear weapons, the problem is until we all trust each other to do it at the same time, no government will. What happened at the end of ww2 must never happen again. The only way to ensure that is to destroy every last nuclear bomb.
I am not afraid of someone like Iraq or Iran having nuclear weapons --plural. A government that understands it can be completely obliterated in retaliation will not use them. If Iran used a weapon, millions of Iranians would be incinerated in the retaliation. An Iran or Iraq with 10 nuclear weapons does not scare me -- it is the thought of the nutcase group with ONE that scares me. The group that has ONE and is not concerned with retaliation is a group that would use it. And that is more scary than the thought of a conservative theoracracy.
Chad Belville, Esq
Phoenix, Arizona
www.chadknowslaw.com
Keeping you out of trouble is easier than getting you out of trouble!
Time to ban the organized religions, like Catholicism & Christianity and Islam & Muslim --- they are all the biggest & loudest noisemakers around … going off every few seconds, killing hundreds and thousands of people, everyday! All in the name of “god”. Cool, maybe well add the proverbial unicorn (god) to the list of banned items!
Heck, what am I say … that is where I’d start!
Ostrich syndrome is what I call that --- bury the head (cover eyes), because what you can’t see can’t hurt.
WRONG!
As with drugs, "banning" firearms is not the rational move, at all - one is merely throwing the problem in to a pit (hiding from it), in hopes that the easily impressionable ones will simply walk on by. BUT, they do not.
All the while strong capable minds suffer. (What a nice forced equality society is creating!)
It does not help that people, in general, are very cruel, very lazy and filled to the rim with jealousy, especially on this side of the pond! Mainstream promotes "living large" more and more, so crime goes up!
People hump like rabbits and spit out lil'uns (population grows) so here comes more crime.
Just because you pass a law about something, it doesn't "go away."Originally Posted by marcjacob
(Porn allegedly harms women, right? Let's enact a ban for the public good!)
And gun control laws are what they say on paper, but in practive not necessesarily effective. For example, Quebec has comparatively very stringent gun control laws compared to the other Canadian provinces, but several weeks ago there was yet another college campus shooting in Montreal. (and it wasn't the first)
The concept about gun rights stems from personal responsibility, an attitude which clashes with the worldview that rights are derived from the government, and given or taken away as priviledges.
Also - gun control laws are exactly like marajuana laws - just because you pass a law, the thing you have deemed objectionable won't go away. It moves into the black market. Plus, marajuana and guns by themseves are not bad things, just when people misuse them.
I don't own a gun, but naturally I think people should have a right to own them. Just like I don't have sex with women, but I think heterosexuals have a right to privacy in their bedroom.
Steve
PS: As a clarification - if cartain states want to enact gun control laws, I don't have a problem with that. Life in Alaska is quite different from the Bronx. Federalism is the most elegant way to handle gun politics in a country as large and diverse like the US. That is a big difference betwen the US and countries like the UK. On the other hand, federal gun laws --- like most federal criminal laws, including federal drug laws.... are heavyhanded and at the end of the day probably cost much more then they benefit.....
The difference there is that porn doesnt really harm women. Guns do kill people and i dont see that can be untrue.
I guess thats what im asking, at what point does it become financially viable to rid society of household guns. How many kids = worth the cost of enforcement. whats the formula.
I agree 100% that a ban wont make it go away, it will reduce it as nuts wont have such simple access to guns.
I know Americans love guns, i guess this is a cultural difference between americans and europeans. I just truly cant understand why after all these school shootings, people still value their "right" to own a gun over the life of a kid.
I have to say i thought id get way more stick over posting this, its actually been an interesting thread to read from a non american point of view. Perhaps i just dont understand the american culture the way i thought i did. I would be interested to hear why guns are so important to americans though.
another question, these armish people, are there many of these types of communities in the states? my parents would love that way of life.
Well that's *your* comfortable opinion. Try not falling into this easy trap. (Why do people have to make politics a "he said/ she said"? )
Consider this: what if it could be directly proven that porn leads to abuse and harm of women. What then? According to you, I guess the government is perfectly justified in banning porn.
Should freedom of speech be snipped because some people get harmed by it? Or is freedom and personal rights more important? Just because some people kill others with guns, why does everyone in society have to lose their freedoms?
Regarding: "I know Americans love guns, i guess this is a cultural difference between americans and europeans. "
You are mischaracterizing things when you opine "if Americans love guns." That's a backhanded comment to be sure! Characterizing all Americans like Gollum sitting in the dark cave, coveting his "precious" gun.
What we love are our freedoms.
Steve
PS: As mentioned before, the US has background checks, waiting periods, laws prohibiting convcted felons from owning firearms. You can reasonably place some controls on it. But to ban guns would be tantamount to the 1930s Prohibition mistake of banning alcohol, which also added significantly to the nation's violent crime and effectively made everyone sipping some gin a criminal.
If the government found that the primary purpose of porn was to end life, then yes, i would support and call for a ban.
An as for how im "mischaracterizing" amercans, your words not mine. i never said any of that.
Abortion (arguably) ends life. Do you think abortions should be banned?
I do not, because i think the *rights* of women to do what they personally decide trumps the role of the state.
Here is another example - rights are derived from the individual people, not established or taken away by the state. And wishing guns away by decree like Houdini waving his magic wand will not make them dissapear, nor violent crime.
Cheers!
Steve
your getting desperate now. im not going to through every possible issue with you.
I beg to differ: a gun's primary purpose is not to end life, rather it is to do the bidding of that which wields it. Also, the operation manual does not state one should point it at vital organs and such. THAT action is the sole choice of the person controlling the gun, bad shot/aim or not.
Of course, that excludes those that receive their "instructions" from the gun itself.
..go on, pop a cap in him, or are you too afraid..
:uhoh: who said that? Is that YOU, Mr.Gun?
A guns primary purpose it to protect (civil servants etc). But, as with many inventions, people will always abuse what's available to them.
I believe the best way to lower gun crimes is to give the kids something better to do, aside from fuckin' bangin'!
And make the dumb ass icons of today (musicians; athletes & movie stars) very responsible for their poor-ass examples! For those that argue they are too meek to do time for their crime, I propose they cough up a very large % of their annual earnings (similar to speeding tickets in that E.European country).
I'd start @ 25%.
Th@ idiot Mel Gibson's Finest ( <-- that's a booze, BTW) pays double!
Well just understand I live in Texas.
In this state, if your cell phone rings in a movie theatre, the ushers or staff will expunge it from your fingers, pull out a sawed off shotgun, and blast it squarely with a bullet in the aisles. No questions asked.
Sharpshooter ushers can take out the disruptive phones from a far distance, right out of your hands while speaking on it. And all in a darkened auditorium.
Steve :smoke:
"From my cold, dead hands!"
Marc, what do the gun crime numbers in the UK look like today as compared to before the guns were made illegal?
I post here to whore this sig.
Excellent! I truly do H8 meatheads that yak on the phone while in a theatre, restaurant, or shopping. Their ever so wanting feeling for others to see how "busy" and "important" is oh so contemptible!
But why take it out on the phone? Remember, it is the tool (person) using the tool (phone) that should be shot!
Homer Simpson said it best: "Lisa, if I didn't have this gun, the king of England could walk right in here and start pushing you around."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks