Quote Originally Posted by gaybucks_chip View Post
Not to mention that the loser Republicans are, for a change, LOSER republicans and Bush's nazis might have a little harder time with their agenda.

I've long believed that 4472 had a lot of stuff that was blatantly unconstitutional, and one of the things I didn't understand was why FSC had done nothing about it. If Steve is corrrect and it doesn't go into effect until the regs are published (which is different from what I heard) that might also explain why the FSC hasn't yet acted.
Well, as I understand it, the addition of nudity or more specifically "lascivious exhibition of the genitals" took effect with the signing of the law, but the part about "simulated sexual activity" requires new regulations to be written before it becomes effective, since it needs to be defined and so on. Clear as mud, right?