Quote Originally Posted by Xstr8guy View Post
I truly doubt there is a single secondary producer that is completely compliant... unless they only have a few sites.

C'mon! Don't tell me that you have a database that has every single url of every depiction of your hundreds of models on hundreds of sites/galleries! That would take years to accomplish. And no one has ever shown me a script/program that can accomplish this task yet.

I'm sorry but I don't think people are being honest about their compliance. Sure, I believe that many primary producers are compliant with the old regs. But I seriously doubt that most are truly compliant with the new regs.
I agree completely. I do not believe that anyone can be 100% compliant with the law the way it is written! If you have a site that uses frames or is otherwise not completely static, maintaining a list of EVERY URL for EVERY IMAGE is impossible.

However, I do not believe anyone is going to jail because their 2257 records do not include every URL or the other asinine requirements. If we look to the Girls Gone Wild prosecution, we see a producer that didn't have complete records and allegedly had underage performers yet walked away with probation and a not-so hefty fine. That does not mean ALL prosecutions would follow that precedent but it certainly sets a standard by which all others will be judged.

Keeping records of every model that appears on the website satisfies the bulk of the intent of the law. If I were making the prosecution decision, I certainly would not waste time on a producer that had copies of IDs for every model, evidence that all models were 18 at the time of the shooting, but failed to comply with the "every URL ever used" technicality.