Quote Originally Posted by Squirt View Post
Hey maybe it's a new trend in the treatment of pornographers? Maybe most judges feel that 2257 is unfair, and merky at best, in it's current form? Maybe we can all look forward to this kind of treatment by judges?

Right? That was my point. We should be HAPPY about this.

By the way, has there been a single inspection yet on a gay company? Shows you how much we're on their radar...