Who decides what "crossing the line" is?
This is similar to the bareback controversy and producers not trusting the viewer to do the "responsible" thing.
So by limiting the freedom of expression that these "shows" express, what are you accomplishing?
No matter WHAT you do , there will ALWAYS be stupid people who do self destructive things, or regular people who have a momentary lapse of judgement, it's a fact of life.
In the end, what will "pulling the shows" that you feel "cross the line" accomplish? Who benifits from you censoring input to the masses? :cop:
Bookmarks