Quote Originally Posted by Dick Hunter View Post
Good points. However, do you really think that the models don't know the risks? They'd have to be retarded, IMO. My guess is that many of these guys have bareback sex in their personal lives on a regular basis anyways.

I think it's more important for the producers to make the consumers aware of the dangers of having bareback sex. They should explain that this is a fantasy situation, and you should never do this in real life, unless you're stupid (like the models?).

I don't know. If these guys are having bareback sex all the time anyway, is it really so bad to film it, as long as you make people who are watching that these guys are taking huge risks?

Like I said, I don't know. I hate to come off like I support bareback.
I was fortunate enough to receive trial training from the US Department of Justice when I was a prosecutor. I was told to assume that my entire jury had only 7th grade educations. I would never assume that a model was informed of the dangers of barebacking. Hell, so much so-called "sex ed" is teaching abstinence that what little real education there is can be lost.

I think the responsible producer should assume their models know nothing about the dangers of barebacking, STD's, or the repercussions of having their images in hardcore films for the rest of their lives. A good producer will make sure the model is aware that barebacking is a dangerous practice, you can still transmit STD's even using condoms [such as herpes that is spread by contact] and that teachers lose jobs when the school board finds out about the hardcore film released 10 years ago.