Quote Originally Posted by Dick Hunter View Post
The guy in the third clip that Chip is talking about is Michel Lozier, founder of maleflixxx. From what I understand, it's the Canadian laws that prevent maleflixxx from accepting bareback movies. However, that doesn't mean that if that weren't the law, the people at maleflixxx wouldn't have come to the same decision. I do question that though, consider the AEBN and Hot Movies both have bareback, so the pressure is on.
Hi Everyone,

Dick Hunter brought this thread to my attention, so I thought I'd weigh in on why Maleflixxx doesn't stream bareback content. While the laws are slightly different in Canada as to what defines obscenity (and these have recently loosened), barebacking was never a banner subject, so our reasons for choosing not to stream bareback content are simply a decision of our company.

Maleflixxx is gay owned and gay operated, and our owners and founders (like many of you) lived through the 80s watching our friends die, not knowing why and then dealing with the prejudice and ostracization that was a result of this disease.

While we don't want to get on a moral high horse, and rarely involve ourselves in this argument the choice to create and/or stream bareback content is simply that, a choice. There is money to be made for bareback content, but no one could convince me that studios like Falcon, Titan and Hot House will go the way of the DoDo Bird if they don't go condom optional - that is a fallacy, and a dangerous one for our industry.

Bareback content is a niche, a fad, it is not taking over. There is a market for it, but it isn't the entire market and it isn't even a large portion of the market. It just seems so because it polarizes our community. As responsible webmasters and business owners, it is incumbent on us to see through the hype.