Quote Originally Posted by A_DeAngelo View Post
If producers feel so strongly about putting the wrong message out there - "monkey see mokey do..." - than the content should be labeled appropriately and marked with disclaimers similar to ours

I think that producers should take full responsibility for the content they produced and should stop hiding behind the invisible label of "pre condom" to mask the fact that they filmed people fucking without condoms even when they knew people were at risk of contracting HIV - primarily between 1982 - 1990
I agree with that, and practically speaking, there's almost no way to know when the so-called "pre condom" content was shot.

On a peripherally related note, Tony, I remember you saying something about re-purposing or re-editing of precondom (pre-2257) content and the legal issues. Did you or whomever was working on that ever get a read on what level of reediting or republishing content would trigger 2257 requirements?

I've heard some argue that *any* change, including adding a safer sex notice, would constitute republishing, which might then trigger 2257... but I've heard others say that the law is clear, and you only have to have a notice of exemption if the content was actually produced (shot) prior to July 1995. Curious if you found anything out.