Which is why I qualified the question with "unusual circumstances." I don't think many would disagree that they were likely reasonable terminations.

I'm just saying "as I see fit" is a very broad entitlement and potentially subject to abuse just as much as it is for legit/legal reasons. I'm trying to find where some program owners and affiliates might be at such a crossroads in some (apparent) cases that could tempt owners to find ways to penny-pinch ethical partners.

Relating to the other thread, I don't think an owner is entitled to 100% of rebills if an ethical affiliate can't deliver or convert traffic any longer, for example. I would suggest they legally and legitimately earned their share. Is that an unfair sense of entitlement on my part?