I agree. I don't think it's always used as an end all and be all, but it is an old standby. I remember when it was used against homosexuals because we were "recruiting young boys and girls to be Gay"

I guess my opinion would be diffrent if i was older.
Truth be told I find that more Gay men dislike the fact I have a nasty habit of having sex with women from time to time.


I agree. It's funny though, goto a library and where is the security keeping children from seeing naked bodies in books, pornographic texts, sex ed books, etc.?


True.



Stating facts about the conservative christian agenda isn't attacking them. However we are in the adult industry, and we are homosexuals, we are under attack both in our freedom of speech and civil rights, as we all know. I'm not one of the hate all christians or hate all republican types.


I guess for me I've always felt that my speech and civil rights were under attack. So yeah I see that. I want things even I guess. First i was wrong beacuse I liked men, then I was wrong beacause I liked (a) women.
I think we as a gay comunity are actually segrigating straight people.


I have a hard time being convinced that the internet should be deemed a child safe zone or that a site owner is responsible for what a parent gives their child access to. If a parent let's their child surf the internet alone, or goto the library alone, they can expect that something they don't approve of might happen right?


TRUE!

But as a gesture of good faith we should try to come up with some method, beacuse it's better then none, and then no one can't say that we didn't try.