Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Feds Raid Max Hardcore Offices

  1. #16
    chick with a bass basschick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,922
    but since a lot more "normal" people DO see something wrong with piss content, and the obscenity laws here say community standards are what defines obscenity. that means anytime someone produces shock content, it can be found obscene somewhere.

    and btw, this is nothing new. in 1996, lee noga and our lawyer both told us fisting and piss content was very iffy and could be found obscene in some locations - and was much more likely to be investigated and/or prosecuted. and it wasn't new at the time, either. that was the word in porn videos and magazines for at least several years before that.

    Quote Originally Posted by Xstr8guy View Post
    Welcome to the era of boring vanilla porn. And Lee, you reveling in it just makes it that much worse.

    I don't see anything wrong with a little pee and fisting amongst consenting adults. What will a companies like Titan do now? Pissing and fisting are very common in their videos and they aren't even considered an 'extreme' porn studio by gay porn standards.


  2. #17
    Homosexuals cannot biologically reproduce children; therefore, they must recruit our children. chubbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    295
    SO frustrated right now I don't know where to begin. If the models agreed to be pissed on, the producers paid them accordingly and the buyer new what he wanted and got just that, where's the crime here???

    I know I know. Just so fucking tired of gov't. telling the public what they can and can't watch in the privacy of their own homes. Fucking pieces of dick!

    I wish Max the best of luck in this fight and in the end hope his company is still around producing even more hardcore niche porn for the grown ass adults that want it!

    --Chubbs


  3. #18
    Gay Marriage - It's our Pearl Harbor. Titanmen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    269
    Did anyone notice that they mentioned "female performers" in the indictment and that the two USA attorneys that signed the indictment were both women?

    The government is going to work the degradation to women aspect in this case. They feel like they have a better shot when they can stand up in front of a jury and say, "Isn't this awful what he is doing to these poor women. blah, blah, blah." And if they can have a female attorney do it, so much the better.


  4. #19
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,636
    Quote Originally Posted by Titanmen View Post
    The government is going to work the degradation to women aspect in this case. They feel like they have a better shot when they can stand up in front of a jury and say, "Isn't this awful what he is doing to these poor women. blah, blah, blah." And if they can have a female attorney do it, so much the better.
    Im sure the pissing and puking on women will be a big part of the governments case to, not just degrading them, but the content overall.

    Regards,

    Lee


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •