I think it would be a stretch for anyone to think that our primary brand is implying that we're all underage here though. I think "potentially imply" is pretty broad and there is a whole lot of context that should and is by most taken into account.
That being said, if I had to do over, i would probably of used a more inclusive name. But, the reason isn't because I think our name is dirty, but sometimes there are more senior gentlemen who don't think of themselves as boys any longer. It can sometimes be a bit harder to reach out to the polar bear community with our name
. . . but we are deep in this brand and its a minor problem I hear about once or twice a year at most.
Originally Posted by Lee
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks