WNC...I should have been clearer. We very carefully review the sort of reviews that are being done. If the emphasis seems to be on the quantity of material rather than the quality and if points are deducted because we embed our video (we want to control the size of the image and hence the quality of what they see) Then we pass.

The comment about the huge images on some adult sites is really interesting. For a while our images were at minimum 2048 wide and we got tons of complaints from folks that did not use IE, and those that did said the images were grainy. Hell we even had a couple complaints that the thumnails showed a 'naked man' and the 'pic was only his head'....scroll bar anyone? We did these because we wanted those who chose to print them to have a blast...but folks don't do that. Many asked but almost none did. So we went back to 1000 wide. (resizing all this from the orginal psd...man oh man....I hope I don't have to do that again anytime soon). We have a great out source, but until we settle on exactly what we are going to do (probably two sizes) seems goofy to put him on it.