So far the primary argument against shooting gay porn without condoms are abuses and wrongdoings by the producers and sexually active models that have sex after their test but before they perform. These are not issues with condomless porn, these are issues with the people involved doing things they should not. The issues should not be confused. We should not condemn condomless porn because there are some bad people involved in it; the bad behavior should be addressed and corrected.

The next argument is that porn without condoms send the wrong message. As much as I respect the speakers, I say "fuck that noise" because when one wants to stifle expression because it "sends the wrong message" that is censorship, and I unconditionally support the right to expression, even if it is unpopular.

Condomless porn in itself is not bad and should not be penalized or marginalized. The abuses by the bad apples do need to be addressed, but a blanket condemnation of the genre of porn without condoms will not solve any problems at all. The market dictates what will be produced; the suppliers are responsible for HOW.