Factory Video Releases First Bareback Title

[A_DeAngelo]

you know, everyone... I'd love to join in for a spirited debate...

however, we are in the middle of relocating our home and business to the Central Coast of California and I'm up to my nipples in wires and plugs

I'll join in sometime in the next week or so (if this thread is still alive)

somehow, this topic is always a HOT one

so keep it going, always love good, whole hearted discussions on this topic

much love to everyone from Tony&Cam

the BAREBACK MASTERS

[basschick]

up to your nipples in wires and plugs - now THERE's a picture *LOL*

you know, everyone... I'd love to join in for a spirited debate...

however, we are in the middle of relocating our home and business to the Central Coast of California and I'm up to my nipples in wires and plugs

I'll join in sometime in the next week or so (if this thread is still alive)

somehow, this topic is always a HOT one

so keep it going, always love good, whole hearted discussions on this topic

much love to everyone from Tony&Cam

the BAREBACK MASTERS

[Matt 26z]

My main concern with the bareback porn segment is that some models might be accepting the jobs (and risk) out of money desperation. When I watch these scenes I can't help but wonder if behind the performance, the bottom is trembling in fear over the raw dick of some guy being inside him. All in the name of no other options to pay this months rent. Those are the models I fear for.

There will always be the other models, the promiscuous guys who are trying to hookup at the club every single weekend. The ones who'll bareback with anyone. If you want to capture what is their everyday behavior on film, I guess that's not such a big deal. But how do you really know who is who?

I have always believed producers should leave barebacking up to the models just before the scene is shot. Not a requirement to get the job. Not paid a penny more. No incentive to do it. Only then do you know it was 100% consensual.

[basschick]

i've definitely heard stories about models who didn't want to bareback but desparately needed the money.

i think your description of those who bareback willingly sounded very judgemental. how is someone who fucks without a condom more promiscuous than someone who wears a condom? for that matter, i feel that the entire concept of promiscuity is archaic. why shouldn't a person fuck who they want for pleasure?

a bareback production can't leave it up to the last minute whether the models will use condoms as their material is - by definition - condom-free. i also think leaving it to the model at the last minute means no full disclosure and also allows the model to make a spur of the moment choice he or she would not have made if someone had sat down with them and explained everything. it also wouldn't work if one model suddenly thought "fuck it - i'm going bareback!" in a scene with a guy who is condom-only.

My main concern with the bareback porn segment is that some models might be accepting the jobs (and risk) out of money desperation. When I watch these scenes I can't help but wonder if behind the performance, the bottom is trembling in fear over the raw dick of some guy being inside him. All in the name of no other options to pay this months rent. Those are the models I fear for.

There will always be the other models, the promiscuous guys who are trying to hookup at the club every single weekend. The ones who'll bareback with anyone. If you want to capture what is their everyday behavior on film, I guess that's not such a big deal. But how do you really know who is who?

I have always believed producers should leave barebacking up to the models just before the scene is shot. Not a requirement to get the job. Not paid a penny more. No incentive to do it. Only then do you know it was 100% consensual.