Bill- Perhaps you can explain to us all how bareback sex with internal cumshots would not be considered "unsafe sex"? I'm very careful how I chose my words and I purposely chose those words because the sex depicted in bareback films is considered "unsafe sex". When I am referring to sex that includes the use of condoms, then I generally use the more correct term of "safer sex". Please do not try and put words in my mouth.

You've also heard me say many times, that people have the right to make and view whatever they would like to make. Above all I believe in the freedom of speech. But, freedom of speech is a two way street. I have every right to stand up and challenge what I believe is a dangerous and irresponsible business model. At the same time I applaud your efforts to stand up and defend your side of the issue as well.

Bill, you may very well be the exception to the rule within the bareback part of the industry. You where one of the originators of the genre and I believe your motives were very different from the motives of others that followed behind you. Unfortunately, many of the others that followed in your footsteps had much different motivations that ended up making you all look bad.

From what I have seen the vast majority of producers making bareback, and twink bareback in particular, are sleazy opportunists that are just out to make a buck. They are not doing it because they believe in the freedom of speech issues, they are doing it to make money. I know several of the producers that themselves are HIV negative and would never bareback personally, yet they will pay some 19 year old kid an extra $200 to take a load up his ass. That I find repugnant and disgusting!

I have never and will never personally attack you or HDK. I'm sorry that you feel attacked, but unfortunately you get lumped into the "bareback industry" by default. Perhaps you can take the lead in your part of the industry and get others to operate in a more socially responsible manner such as yourself?