Quote Originally Posted by Dilbertdidporn View Post

The same for Rufus Ffoulkes a career criminal with 58 convictions for Frauds of multiple description and yet many are convinced only one of his films are suspect (for underage porn) Why?

Because Rufus assures us he was compliant on 2257 as he heads to the British pokey?

We do place a lot of "faith" in people here, I guess my Agnosticism breads skepticism. And no I am not being snarky just observing.
Ummm. It was actually because of this example that you mentioned that I have no faith in anything he has done. In fact I would go so far as to encourage anyone with content he has produced to take a closer look and maybe question it.

That's the point. Some companies that violate laws once have many times done so other times in the past. Just seems to be the way the world works. Strange, but true.