Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: Supremes uphold PROTECT act... is this an erosion of free speech?

  1. #16
    chick with a bass basschick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,922
    chad, i love your analogy

    Quote Originally Posted by chadknowslaw View Post
    Yep. It is like driving a beat up red Trans Am with a big marijuana leaf bumper sticker at the speed limit. You might not be breaking the speed limit, but the cops may follow you and pull you over for a broken tail light so they can take a good look at you and find out if you have a bag of weed in the car.


  2. #17
    throw fundamentalists to the lions chadknowslaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    2,149
    Quote Originally Posted by basschick View Post
    chad, i love your analogy

    :-)

    he he he

    Most lawyers like to phrase things so that only other lawyers understand. I like to speak so that everybody understands.
    Chad Belville, Esq
    Phoenix, Arizona
    www.chadknowslaw.com
    Keeping you out of trouble is easier than getting you out of trouble!


  3. #18
    "That which submits is not always weak" Kushiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by chadknowslaw View Post
    :-)

    he he he

    Most lawyers like to phrase things so that only other lawyers understand. I like to speak so that everybody understands.
    It's appreciated, Chad.
    I've never understood why anyone would take legal advice and listen to someone that speaks only in jargon. That's a lot of trust to put into someone without knowing what the hell's going on.
    "All things in moderation... even moderation itself.." B.F.


  4. #19
    Camper than a row of tents
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    636
    Quote Originally Posted by chadknowslaw View Post
    No, it could not be used against a legitimate barely legal pornographer. If you put "All models were over the age of 18" statement on your site then it is obvious that you are not selling child porn nor are you implying that it is child porn.

    I like using cocaine as an analogy. If I sell cocaine, that is illegal and I can be prosecuted. If I bag up baking powder in little baggies and tell people it is cocaine and sell it as cocaine, I can be prosecuted for the attempt to sell cocaine because a reasonable person would believe I am selling cocaine. If I bag up baking powder and put a label that says "Contents: 100% pure baking powder" and sell it as baking powder, I have done nothing wrong and cannot be convicted.
    What about if you sell a powdery white substance without telling anyone what it is? Some see it as cocaine. Others see it as baking powder.

    Likewise, what if a webmaster posts a promo page without saying all models are 18?

    It sounds like it might be advisable to have an age statement on every single page now.
    I post here to whore this sig.


  5. #20
    "That which submits is not always weak" Kushiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt 26z View Post
    What about if you sell a powdery white substance without telling anyone what it is? Some see it as cocaine. Others see it as baking powder.

    Likewise, what if a webmaster posts a promo page without saying all models are 18?

    It sounds like it might be advisable to have an age statement on every single page now.
    First... I don't think someone would buy a white substance without asking what it is. I've never heard of someone walking up and asking.. "Hey.. you wanna buy some unidentified powdered substance? Hit or miss.. do whatever you want with it.. It's a grab-bag of fun", or the other way around... "Hey man... you know where I can score some unknown white powder?"... somewhere along the way, there's going to need to be some clarification, or someone is being careless.

    Likewise, I'm fairly certain there's not going to be a russian-roulette offering of "I have no idea how old this guy is"... Again, with the careless.

    Plus, since nearly every website I've looked at in the last 9 months has had 2257 compliant plastered somewhere on the page, as well as the disclaimer that everything is 18+, I don't think it's that worrisome. It's been 'advisable' to state that all talent is of legal age for the last decade. All it takes is a single line of HTML, somewhere, and you're done. Situation clarified, crisis averted.
    "All things in moderation... even moderation itself.." B.F.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •