Quote Originally Posted by nickbaer View Post
Wether or not some webmaster has done someone wrong, in the past or in the present, nuking someone's affiliate account and cutting off future rebill earnings has very questionable legal standing.

Even in ManifestMen's case, vindicating an alleged wrong doing by with holding earnings, withholding monies to financially redress an alleged wrong doing, is putting one self above the law.

At least, get the relief from the Court, and then apply the rebill earnings to offset the Court award.

In the meantime, I think all webmasters should think twice about trying to drive traffic to any sponsor program involved in such actions.

It seems to me that that is the purpose of the post and the purpose of this Board.
There are so many things wrong with this line of thinking Nick.

One: If you believe that any one of my affiliates has generated enough sales in the past year to cover 25k in attorney costs that a decently executed lawsuit would cost, you are mistaken.

Two: There was no "alleged" to the affiliate's theft. It was clear and there was zero denial.

Three: "Questionable legal standing"? We are completely within our rights in each action we take.


I too encourage any affiliate that believes that they are within their rights to pirate our content, to falsely promote our site as a hardcore fisting site or to use images from 'barely legal' sites to promote the sales of Manifest Men to think twice about trying to drive traffic to our sites.

I do not put myself above the law. When it comes to our site and our program, I am the law.