The issue i have with bareback vs. pre-condom is that in my eyes (and im sure there are people who will disagree with my views on this) pre-condom isnt actually 'as bad' as bareback because back in the 70's and 80's and before, pre-condom sex was considered the 'norm' and was not produced to illicit a response from the surfer/viewer.

Bareback on the other hand, is deliberately produced to (and sometimes with the mindset of, models contracting HIV/AIDs) illicit that 'look we're edgy' feel from the studios/producers of this type of content, it has become a marketing tool for many... With a total disregard for models safety and that is wrong.

Pre-condom porn on the other hand, was natural during the time it was produced, people didnt know any better and whilst that doesnt make it 'right' from a safe sex perspective, it does make it right from the fact it isnt being produced a studio or individual solely for the purpose of saying 'look we have bareback and all our models are cum sluts' when in reality, they could be making just as much money from the same production had the models practiced safe sex.

Unfortunately, many in the industry feel that they need to produce 'bareback' in order to remain profitable, just as many in the straight side of the business feel they have to produce 'extreme' content that pushes the limits of obscenity.... When the reality of it is, unless the producer/studio actually has a 'thing' for bareback (which i too can understand) there really isnt any reason for anyone to be producing the stuff other than not being able to think of anything else to do.

Regards,

Lee