Here's my two cents (Which I am sure is all it’s worth!)Originally Posted by derekt
Pre-condom films were simply guys fucking without condoms. They pulled out to show the money shot, there was no internal cumshots. There was no eroticization of any high risk sex aspect.
The vast majority of modern day “bareback” films glorify and eroticize the internal cumshots and the high risk sex aspect. It’s all about 40, 50, 100 loads up some guys butt. The more cum you take up your butt the hotter the sex will be. It’s become a culture of eroticizing and glorifying the high risk aspect of sex. The term bareback itself is meant to imply a wild, masculine feeling…not what it really is, high risk sex.
Do you ever see modern "bareback" films that are just guys fucking without a condom and pulling out for the cumshot? Or do you see internal cumshots and cum oozing out a guys ass? The core erotic premise of these films in the internal cumshot and the high risk and “edgy” aspect they are trying to promote.
One man’s opinion….
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks